The Suffolk Fire Experience - Doc 301 Southwold Fireman Vacancies

Interested in other Suffolk Firefighter tales then check out “The Suffolk Hyde Affair” athttp://thesuffolkhydeaffair.blogspot.com/

Emergent Proposition (Doc 67) Reinforced by the events recorded in Doc 205, 224, 225, 263 and now 299?

Doc 67 as stated below

Emergent Proposition Fire Service Command Power syndrome Theory (CPST)*

Fire Service CPST practitioner’s who believe they or their colleagues are threatened, undermined or subject to resistance by those of lower status are motivated toward collateral retaliation. Retaliation measures may be overt or covert.


*The proposition is generated from the development of this case study and the behaviour reported in Doc 65. Collaborating evidence is available pre Doc 32 “The Suffolk Hyde Affair” See: April 2005 Archives
http://thesuffolkhydeaffair.blogspot.com/

Therefore the proposition comes from hindsight and repetitive experience. Full knowledge of “what happens next”? So the proposition is not derived by some grand scientific theorising. It arises from real events


So are the events and actions recorded in Doc 67, 224, 225, 263 and 299 compatible with the emergent proposition? Is it sustained by reality?

What is the force that compels senior Fire Officers to act out such behaviour? FIRE SERVICE COMMAND POWER SYNDROME THEORY?

It is argued that the events reported in Doc 205, 224, 225, 265, 299 and the rest reinforce the emergent proposition above.